
Third-Worldizind the U.S.
“It is said that there are three kinds of people. People who make things happen. People who watch things happen. And people who say, “What happened?”” The third group are always considered to be ignorant about thing going on around them, like immigrants issue about which conservatives preferred to keep calm and do no take side.
Liberals began a campaign to create a permanent Democratic voting bloc for themselves by letting the Third World immigrants to migrate to America. They reached their goal on elections; the Third World immigrants mostly would vote for liberals.
The examples that we would like to focus on are related to Hispanics. First, the overall Hispanic vote constitutes only about 6% of the U.S. electorate. Second, naturalized Hispanics constitute about 28% of the whole Hispanic vote. And third, in exit polls in 2004 only 27% of all Hispanic voters called themselves Republicans. In other words, out of every 1,000 U.S. voters, only about five are immigrant Hispanic Republicans.
Some Republicans claim that Bush received 40% of the overall Hispanic vote in 2004. But that just makes only 2.4% of the total U.S. electorate, to get that he had started pro-Hispanic and anti-conservative proposals in January 2004.
By the way, here the focus is on liberal campaign to fill America with Third World immigrants.
Until the 1960s, US immigrants belong to Americans having family origins in a given country. Because most Americans had family origins in Western Europe, most immigrants went to Western Europe, thus a great number of immigrants helped America’s historic culture. Liberals followed Jim Crow laws and decided to change immigration laws, although most European immigrants of that time did not deserve to be condemned for the plight of blacks in the South. It is important to mention that Europeans were angry of the segregation in the South America. They amended the 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act in such a way that it prevented immigration from Europe and unstrained immigration from elsewhere, and doubled the immigration ceiling of each year, from 150,000 to 290,000 annually. Thus, Third-worldizing America started.
By approving the law in 1965, a senator promised Americans that they do not like to import indigents to US. The immigration system practiced today is the product of further liberalization, by Kennedy and others, of the already-liberal 1965 revision. Ridiculously, that senator was extremely wrong in his claim; “America is indeed flooded with a million immigrants annually. In 2005, the number was 1,122,373. And those are who came legally. God only knows how many illegal aliens came.” And “America is indeed inundated with immigrants from the most populated and deprived nations. At least 75% of today’s immigrants are from the Third World. Nothing needs to be said about illegal aliens.” The total immigration from Third-world has been more than 20 million since 1965. the point that signifies here is that most immigrants of developing countries support politicians who believe in social program, namely Democrats and immigrants of developed countries more likely are in favor of conservatives.
Undoubtedly, immigration from Third-world countries will have impacts and one of the most clear evidences is the language in US. Evidence from the 2000 census:
Third World Languages In U.S. HomesTen most common, and number of speakers
Hispanics have the highest population in US and poverty among them is higher than average US national poverty. Despite these statistics, some Republicans support the Senate’s “comprehensive” immigration bill in May.
Here rise some argument, why are Third-world culture considered as less developed?! One probable answer that people disagreeing immigration of Third-world people say is that if the Third-world culture were strong enough, they would have served its people inside their own territory, thus it is not be acceptable even among their own people, and they come to US seeking for a new culture.
Third-world population, especially Hispanics, is swelling America’s population. It is true; they are certainly a threat to US culture (if we consider American culture as the best and unique culture in the world), to US economy and US politics- if actively being involved in elections. But it is not justifiable to devalue other cultures and language that are growing in US. What is evident is that Third-world cultures are not less valuable that European cultures that once constructed American culture.
“It is said that there are three kinds of people. People who make things happen. People who watch things happen. And people who say, “What happened?”” The third group are always considered to be ignorant about thing going on around them, like immigrants issue about which conservatives preferred to keep calm and do no take side.
Liberals began a campaign to create a permanent Democratic voting bloc for themselves by letting the Third World immigrants to migrate to America. They reached their goal on elections; the Third World immigrants mostly would vote for liberals.
The examples that we would like to focus on are related to Hispanics. First, the overall Hispanic vote constitutes only about 6% of the U.S. electorate. Second, naturalized Hispanics constitute about 28% of the whole Hispanic vote. And third, in exit polls in 2004 only 27% of all Hispanic voters called themselves Republicans. In other words, out of every 1,000 U.S. voters, only about five are immigrant Hispanic Republicans.
Some Republicans claim that Bush received 40% of the overall Hispanic vote in 2004. But that just makes only 2.4% of the total U.S. electorate, to get that he had started pro-Hispanic and anti-conservative proposals in January 2004.
By the way, here the focus is on liberal campaign to fill America with Third World immigrants.
Until the 1960s, US immigrants belong to Americans having family origins in a given country. Because most Americans had family origins in Western Europe, most immigrants went to Western Europe, thus a great number of immigrants helped America’s historic culture. Liberals followed Jim Crow laws and decided to change immigration laws, although most European immigrants of that time did not deserve to be condemned for the plight of blacks in the South. It is important to mention that Europeans were angry of the segregation in the South America. They amended the 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act in such a way that it prevented immigration from Europe and unstrained immigration from elsewhere, and doubled the immigration ceiling of each year, from 150,000 to 290,000 annually. Thus, Third-worldizing America started.
By approving the law in 1965, a senator promised Americans that they do not like to import indigents to US. The immigration system practiced today is the product of further liberalization, by Kennedy and others, of the already-liberal 1965 revision. Ridiculously, that senator was extremely wrong in his claim; “America is indeed flooded with a million immigrants annually. In 2005, the number was 1,122,373. And those are who came legally. God only knows how many illegal aliens came.” And “America is indeed inundated with immigrants from the most populated and deprived nations. At least 75% of today’s immigrants are from the Third World. Nothing needs to be said about illegal aliens.” The total immigration from Third-world has been more than 20 million since 1965. the point that signifies here is that most immigrants of developing countries support politicians who believe in social program, namely Democrats and immigrants of developed countries more likely are in favor of conservatives.
Undoubtedly, immigration from Third-world countries will have impacts and one of the most clear evidences is the language in US. Evidence from the 2000 census:
Third World Languages In U.S. HomesTen most common, and number of speakers
Hispanics have the highest population in US and poverty among them is higher than average US national poverty. Despite these statistics, some Republicans support the Senate’s “comprehensive” immigration bill in May.
Here rise some argument, why are Third-world culture considered as less developed?! One probable answer that people disagreeing immigration of Third-world people say is that if the Third-world culture were strong enough, they would have served its people inside their own territory, thus it is not be acceptable even among their own people, and they come to US seeking for a new culture.
Third-world population, especially Hispanics, is swelling America’s population. It is true; they are certainly a threat to US culture (if we consider American culture as the best and unique culture in the world), to US economy and US politics- if actively being involved in elections. But it is not justifiable to devalue other cultures and language that are growing in US. What is evident is that Third-world cultures are not less valuable that European cultures that once constructed American culture.

